Biomorphology, transformation, and differentiation of joints and digits of the limbs in vertebrates

Oleg Melnyk*, Oleksii Melnyk, Maciej Zdun

museum@nubip.edu.ua

Abstract

The study of morphogenesis, differentiation, and transformation of joints and digits of the vertebrate limbs is a fundamental task of comparative and veterinary anatomy, which can be directly integrated into the practice of clinical surgery and orthopedics. In this context, the anatomical and topographical features of the joints and limb autopodia of both extinct and extant vertebrate species are of particular importance. The purpose of this study was to conduct a biomorphological and comparative anatomical analysis of the patterns of evolutionary transformation, differentiation and muscular architectonics of joints and digits in vertebrates to identify the prerequisites for the occurrence of congenital and acquired orthopedic pathologies of autopodia and limbs. The methods used included dissection, radiography, comparative analysis, photographic documentation, and graphical representation of the study objects. The material for the study was morphological structures of fish (Trigla lucerna, Carassius gibelio forma auratus), museum paleontological resources, and the appendicular skeleton and muscular apparatus of present-day mammals (Equus hemionus, Equus caballus, Sus scrofa var. domestica, Giraffa camelopardalis, Bos taurus, Bison bonasus, Camelus bactrianus, Tapirus terrestris), and Homo sapiens. The biomorphological analysis of Trigla lucerna revealed that the free rays of the pectoral fins function as isolated, digit-like structures with autonomous sensory and motor innervation, while the specific features of their morphology indicated a high degree of specialisation of the locomotor apparatus. Clinical cases of polydactyly, oligodactyly, and polymelia in various taxonomic groups of animals were analysed. It was proved that the identified developmental anomalies call into question simplified evolutionary models of reduction or multiplication of finger elements. Phylogenetic transition of Equidae to monodactyly, due to the dominance of ray III, provided high locomotor adaptation but created a critical biomechanical load on autopodia, which led to the pathogenesis of a number of diseases of the distal extremities, in particular in horses. It was found that the reduction of lateral metapodia limited the compensatory capabilities of the limb, making therapy and prevention of this syndrome impossible without pathogenetically substantiated biomechanical correction and redistribution of static and dynamic forces in the distal region. The obtained data allow differentiating the species norm from developmental pathology, which is important for accurate interpretation of visual diagnostics (computer and magnetic resonance imaging, radiography), development of rational surgical access, and individualisation of orthopedic care for animals in veterinary practice.

Keywords

comparative anatomy; morphological structure; veterinary orthopaedics; autopodial pathologies; locomotion

Suggested citation
Melnyk, O., Melnyk, O., & Zdun, M. (2026). Biomorphology, transformation, and differentiation of joints and digits of the limbs in vertebrates. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 17(3), 60-91. https://doi.org/10.31548/veterinary3.2026.60
References
  1. Abdala, V., & Manafzadeh, A. (2026). Special issue: The evolution of joints in vertebrates. Journal of Anatomy, 248(6), article number 889. doi: 10.1111/joa.70169.
  2. Alber, M., & Zhang, Y.-T. (2010). Bare bones pattern formation: A core regulatory network in varying geometries reproduces major features of vertebrate limb development and evolution. PLoS ONE, 5(5), article number e10892. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0010892.
  3. Barta, D.E., Nesbitt, S.J., & Norell, M.A. (2018). The evolution of the manus of early theropod dinosaurs is characterized by high inter- and intraspecific variation. Journal of Anatomy, 232(1), 80-104. doi: 10.1111/joa.12719.
  4. Bénazet, J.D., & Zeller, R. (2009). Vertebrate limb development: Moving from classical morphogen gradients to an integrated 4-dimensional patterning system. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 1(4), article number a001339. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001339.
  5. Caldwell, M.W. (1997). Modified perichondral ossification and the evolution of paddle-like limbs in ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17(3), 534-547. doi: 10.1080/02724634.1997.10011000.
  6. Caldwell, M.W. (2002). From fins to limbs to fins: Limb evolution in fossil marine reptiles. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 112(3), 236-249. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10773.
  7. Campos, L., Fernandez, M.S., Herrera, Y., & Garrido, A. (2021). Morphological disparity in the evolution of the ophthalmosaurid forefin: New clues from the Upper Jurassic of Argentina. Papers in Palaeontology, 7(4), 1995-2020. doi: 10.1002/spp2.1374
  8. Carril, J., De Mendoza, R.S., Degrange, F.J., Barbeito, C.G., & Tambussi, C.P. (2024). Evolution of avian foot morphology through anatomical network analysis. Nature Communications, 15(1), article number 9888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54297-9.
  9. Esteve-Altava, B., Molnar, J.L., Johnston, P., Hutchinson, J.R., & Diogo, R. (2018). Anatomical network analysis of the musculoskeletal system reveals integration loss and parcellation boost during the fins-to-limbs transition. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 72(3), 601-618. doi: 10.1111/evo.13430.
  10. Esteve-Altava, B., Pierce, S.E., Molnar, J.L., Johnston, P., Diogo, R., & Hutchinson, J.R. (2019). Evolutionary parallelisms of pectoral and pelvic network-anatomy from fins to limbs. Science Advances, 5(5), article number eaau7459. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7459.
  11. Fernández, M.S., Campos, L., Manzo, A., & Vlachos, E. (2024). Bone connectivity and the evolution of ichthyosaur fins. Diversity, 16(6), article number 349. doi: 10.3390/d16060349.
  12. Fish, F.E. (2023). Aquatic locomotion: Environmental constraints that drive convergent evolution. In Convergent evolution: Animal form and function (pp. 477-522). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_15.
  13. Fritzsch, B., & Yamoah, E.N. (2026). Evolution of bony fish: Without a cryptic sarcopterygian, it may have evolved actinopterygians into terrestrial animals. Diversity, 18(5), number 293. doi: 10.3390/d18050293.
  14. Fröbisch, N.B. (2008). Ossification patterns in the tetrapod limb-conservation and divergence from morphogenetic events. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 83(4), 571-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00055.x.
  15. George, J.C., & Berger, A.J. (1966). Avian myology. New York: Academic Press.
  16. Giles, S., Feilich, K., Warnock, R.C.M., Pierce, S.E., & Friedman, M. (2023). A Late Devonian actinopterygian suggests high lineage survivorship across the end-Devonian mass extinction. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7(1), 10-19. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01919-4.
  17. Guinard, G. (2022). The forelimbs of Alvarezsauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): Insight from evolutionary teratology. Journal of Morphology, 283(9), 1257-1272. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21500.
  18. Harris, J.E. (1937). The mechanical significance of the position and movements of the paired fins in the Teleostei. Papers from Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 31, 173-189.
  19. Harris, J.E. (1953). Fin patterns and mode of life in fishes. In Essays in marine biology: Being the Richard Elmhirst memorial lectures (pp. 17-28). Edinburgh‐London: Oliver & Boyd.
  20. Janis, C.M., & Bernor, R.L. (2019). The evolution of equid monodactyly: A review Including a New Hypothesis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, article number 119. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00119.
  21. Konietzko-Meier, D., Teschner, E.M., Bodzioch, A., & Sander, P.M. (2020). Pentadactyl manus of the Metoposaurus krasiejowensis from the Late Triassic of Poland, the first record of pentadactyly among Temnospondyli. Journal of Anatomy, 237(6), 1151-1161. doi: 10.1111/joa.13276.
  22. Lischer, C.J. (2008). Fractures of the splint bones: The importance of soft tissue attachments. Equine Veterinary Education, 20(7), 380-382. doi: 10.2746/095777308X330666.
  23. Love, A.C. (2024). Evolution and development: Conceptual issues. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108616751.
  24. Martin, E.M., Norris, R.M., Porto, A., & Sherratt, E. (2026). Similarities in morphological integration and evolutionary potential across four common foot forms in birds. Evolutionary Biology, 53, 85-102. doi: 10.1007/s11692-026-09666-1.
  25. Mead, A., Funston, G., & Brusatte, S. (2025). Forelimb reduction and digit loss were evolutionarily decoupled in oviraptorosaurian theropod dinosaurs. Royal Society Open Science, 12(3), article number 242114. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242114.
  26. Melnyk, O.P. (2011). Biomorphology of the shoulder girdle in vertebrates. (Doctoral dissertation, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  27. Melnyk, O.P., & Moroz, V.F. (2008). The mechanisms underlying the functioning of the limbs of quadrupedal animals during terrestrial statolocomotion. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 2(49), 129-133.
  28. Merijn, A.G., de Bakker, L.N., Dijkerman, A.K., Chung, W.Yu., Oudesluys, E.C., de Jager, K., Willemse, J., & Richardson, M.K. (2025). Changes in evolutionary developmental control points in the amniote limb may explain hyperphalangy. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 42(6), article number msaf113. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf113.
  29. Myakushko, S.A. (2019). Systematics of mammals. Kyiv: IE I.Yu. Orlov.
  30. Nebreda, S.M., Hernández Fernández, M., & Marugán-Lobón, J. (2025). Macroevolutionary integration underlies limb modularity in the origin of avian flight. Biology Letters, 21(5), article number 20240685. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0685.
  31. Newman, S.A., & Müller, G.B. (2005). Origination and innovation in the vertebrate limb skeleton: An epigenetic perspective. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 304(6), 593-609. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21066.
  32. Oh, J.D.H., et al. (2024). Insights into digit evolution from a fate map study of the forearm using Chameleon, a new transgenic chicken line. Development, 151(13), article number dev202340. doi: 10.1242/dev.202340.
  33. Shahkhosravi, N.A., Kakavand, R., Davies, H.M.S., & Komeili, A. (2023). The influence of equine hoof conformation on the initiation and progression of laminitis. Equine Veterinary Journal, 55(5), 862-871. doi: 10.1111/evj.13887.
  34. Shapiro, M., Shubin, N., & Downs, J. (2007). Limb diversity and digit reduction in reptilian evolution. In Fins into limbs: Evolution, development, and transformation (pp. 225-244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/9780226313405.
  35. Stewart, T.A., Liang, C., Cotney, J.L., Noonan, J.P., Sanger, T.J., & Wagner, G.P. (2019). Evidence against tetrapod-wide digit identities and for a limited frame shift in bird wings. Nature Communications, 10(1), article number 3244. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11215-8.
  36. Tahar, S.V., Duerr, T.J., Comellas, E., Monaghan, J., Muñoz, J.J., & Shefelbine, S.J. (2025). Growth and patterning in vertebrate limb development: A timescale perspective on skeletal specification. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.20.644440.
  37. Tanaka, M. (2009). Evolution of vertebrate limb development. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.  doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002099.
  38. Trofka, A., et al. (2021). Genetic basis for an evolutionary shift from ancestral preaxial to postaxial limb polarity in non-urodele vertebrates. Current Biology, 31(22), 4923-4934. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.010.
  39. Waguespack, R.W., & Hanson, R.R. (2011). Treating navicular syndrome in equine patients. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian, 33(1), article number E2.
  40. Woltering, J.M., & Meyer, A. (2015). The phantoms of a high-seven – or – why do our thumbs stick out? Frontiers in Zoology, 12, article number 23. doi: 10.1186/s12983-015-0117-x.
  41. Woltering, J.M., Irisarri, I., Ericsson, R., Joss, J.M.P., Sordino, P., & Meyer, A. (2020). Sarcopterygian fin ontogeny elucidates the origin of hands with digits. Science Advances, 6(34), article number eabc3510. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc3510.