Effects of probiotic feed supplement on antibiotic resistance of E. coli cultures in puppies

Svyatoslav Sokolenko, Taras Farionik
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of Escherichia coli to antibiotics in the context of supplementing the diet of three-month-old French bulldog puppies with a probiotic as a biologically active additive. The study employed standard clinical, microbiological, and bacteriological methods, specifically, the disk-diffusion method to assess the sensitivity of Escherichia coli cultures to antibiotics and the general bacteriological contamination of faeces samples of puppies of one control group and two experimental groups of puppies that received a probiotic preparation as a feed supplement to the main diet. The study of the effects of the probiotic on the intestinal microflora of puppies found that the use of the probiotic significantly influenced the level of bacterial contamination of the stool samples of the experimental groups. The results of determining the sensitivity of Escherichia coli culture to 14 antibiotics were provided. The sensitivity of the culture to the selected antibiotic was determined by the size of the diameter of the growth retardation zones of microorganisms. The findings of the study revealed that the cultures were reliably susceptible to fosfomycin, kanamycin, and azithromycin. The addition of a probiotic symbiotic preparation based on Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis to the diet of the dogs had a significant effect on sensitivity in 78.6% of combinations of conditions and antibacterial substances. Considering the current findings of analogous studies of the preparation on poultry and data on the improvement of biosynthetic processes in the digestive tract, indicators of poultry productivity, as well as an increase in the weight of individuals and the intensity of metabolic processes in the body, there are significant prospects for further research in this area and a more detailed study on the use of probiotic therapy in healthy puppies. The findings of the present study can be useful for veterinarians, scientists, and kennel workers of the Kennel Club of Ukraine, the Canine Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and other law enforcement agencies that directly maintain service dogs

Keywords

resistance; Escherichia coli; sensitivity of bacteria; probiotic therapy; probiotic

Suggested citation
Sokolenko, S., & Farionik, T. (2025). Effects of probiotic feed supplement on antibiotic resistance of E. coli cultures in puppies. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.31548/veterinary1.2025.30
References

[1] Bogatko, A.F. (2023). Effect of probiotic supplement “Subtiform” on welfare and performance of broiler chickens. In Collection of materials of conferences on veterinary medicine. (pp. 48-50). Kyiv: Scientific and Methodological Center of VFPO.

[2] Brives, C., & Pourraz, J. (2020). Phage therapy as a potential solution in the fight against AMR: Obstacles and possible futures. Palgrave Communications, 6, article number 100. doi: 10.1057/ s41599-020-0478-4.

[3] DSTU 8534:2015. (2017). Food products. The method of detecting and determining the number of enterococci. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_ doc=84208.

[4] DSTU 8680:2016. (2016). Farm poultry. Methods of laboratory diagnosis of colibacillosis. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0238774-16#Text.

[5] European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. (1986, March). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/168007a67b.

[6] Han, B., Liang, S., Sun, J., Tao, H., Wang, Z., Liu, B., Wang, X., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2024). The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on the fecal microbiota, short chain fatty acids, odorous substances, and blood biochemical indices of cats. Microorganisms, 12(1), article number 91. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010091.

[7] Harkavenko, T.O., Nevolmo, O.M., & Kozytska, T.G. (2015). Determining the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibacterial drugs: Methodological guidelines. Kyiv: DNDILDVSE.

[8] Hasan, A., Qazi, J.I., Muzaffer, N., Jabeen, S., & Hussain, A. (2022). Effect of organic acids and probiotics on growth of Apis mellifera workers. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 54(6), 2577-2583. doi: 10.17582/journal.pjz/20210803100802.

[9] Hutsol, A.V., Dmytruk, I.V., & Dmytruk, L.I. (2023). Productivity of young pigs when using probiotic preparations as part of granulated compound feed. Feeds and Feed Production, 96, 172-179. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202396-16.

[10] ISO 4831:2006. (2006). Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of coliforms – Most probable number technique. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/38280.html.

[11] Law of Ukraine No. 3447-IV “On the Protection of Animals from Cruelty”. (2006, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3447-15#Text.

[12] Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2017). Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients, 9(9), article number 1021. doi: 10.3390/nu9091021.

[13] Molina, R.A., Villar, M.D., Miranda, M.H., Maldonado, N.C., Vignolo, G.M., & Nader-Macías, M.E.F. (2023). A multi-strain probiotic promoted recovery of puppies from gastroenteritis in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 64(7), 666-673(8).

[14] Nunan, C. (2017). Antibiotic use in farm animals. In The meat crisis (pp. 228-239). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315562032-14.

[15] O’Brien, T. (1997). Factory farming and human health. Hants: Compassion in World Farming Trust.

[16] Parmanik, A., Das, S., Kar, B., Bose, A., Dwivedi, G.R., & Pandey, M.M. (2022). Current treatment strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria: A review. Current Microbiology, 79, article number 388. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03061-7.

[17] Pentylyuk, S.I. (2006). Modern fodder biopreparations. Animal Husbandry of Ukraine, 6, 25-27.

[18] Saha, M., & Sarkar, A. (2021). Review on multiple facets of drug resistance: A rising challenge in the 21st century. Journal of Xenobiotics, 11(4), 197-214. doi: 10.3390/jox11040013.

[19] Salam, M.A., Al-Amin, Y., Salam, M.T., Pawar, J.S., Akhter, N., Rabaan, A.A., & Alqumber, M.A.A. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance: A growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare, 11(13), article number 1946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946.

[20] Shkromada, O.I., Fotina, T.I., Fotina, H.A., Nechyporenko, O.L., Petrov, R.V., & Fotin, A.I. (2022). Effects of Bacillus subtilis on piglets at weaning. Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University, 1(56), 51-57. doi: 10.32845/bsnau.vet.2022.1.

[21] Tian, Z., Wang, X., Duan, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Azad, A.K., Wang, Z., Blachier, F., & Kong, X. (2021). Dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis promotes the growth and gut health of weaned piglets. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.600772.

[22] Uddin, T.M., et al. (2021). Antibiotic resistance in microbes: History, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(12), 1750-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.10.020.

[23] Van Camp, P.J., Haslam, D.B., & Porollo, A. (2020). Prediction of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria from whole-genome sequencing data. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, article number 1013. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01013.

[24] WHO Regional Office for Europe & European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2023). Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe, 2022 data: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/374172.

[25] WHO. (2016). Global action plan on antibiotic resistance. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789241509763.

[26] Yue, S., Li, Z., Hu, F., & Picimbon, J.F. (2020). Curing piglets from diarrhea and preparation of a healthy microbiome with Bacillus treatment for industrial animal breeding. Scientific Reports, 10(1), article number 19476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75207-1.

[27] Zhou, L., et al. (2024). Dietary Paenibacillus polymyxa AM20 as a new probiotic: Improving effects on IR broiler growth performance, hepatosomatic index, thyroid hormones, lipid profile, immune response, antioxidant parameters, and caecal microorganisms. Poultry Sciences, 103(2), article number 103239. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103239.